The problem with most CD reviews is you only
get the opinion of the one critic doing the review. So we thought it might
be fun to try something new here by giving the exact same CD to two different
critics (or more) and see what they each come up with and just how much
difference a single critic's opinion can make.
This time around antiGUY, Dr. Fever, The
Hobo and Scott Slapp give us their impressions of the new album from Metallica.
Note: due to the nature of this series, the reviews
may tend to be more in the first person than you are used to with music
criticism.
Metallica
– St. Anger
Label: Elektra
Tracks:
Frantic
St. Anger
Some Kind Of Monster
Dirty Window
Invisible Kid
My World
Shoot Me Again
Sweet Amber
Unnamed Feeling
Purify
All Within My Hands
|
antiGUY's review - he gave it a rating
of:
I know going in
that this is going to be a controversial review. I’m glad that we are doing
a tag-team so we can get the perspective of a few people, not just one.
Let me state for the record at the outset that I have never been a HUGE
Metallica fan. So you need to take that into account when reading my review.
Although, I have to say, I absolutely love “Ride the Lightning” and “Kill
Em’ All”. But because I am not a diehard fan that automatically loves
everything the band puts out, I can take a detached view of this disc and
measure it on various levels. My ultimate conclusion is disappointment.
What I looked at
when listening to this disc is the following:
1) How did
it measure up to past work by the band?
a. Conclusion:
In my opinion, one of their weakest efforts.
2) How were the vocals,
guitars and drums?
a. Conclusion:
While the guitars were heavy there was nothing mind-blowing about them.
The vocals when judged against James’ past work fall short as well. The
drums were the worst part; they reach the point of annoyance. I have no
idea what Lars and Bob Rock were trying to accomplish with this sound,
that comes out like Lars is banging on trashcans. But I think that was
what really ruined this disc for me. If the drums would have had a more
traditional sound, I might have been able to get into this disc more.
3) Songwriting:
a. Again,
judging against the band’s past work, the songwriting here seemed like
a step backwards. It also appeared that they suffered from “Turbo” syndrome.
That is an established band that used to be a trendsetter succumbs to the
temptation to remain relevant by co-opting the sound of the current trend
in the band’s relative genre. Judas Priest did it with “Turbo” and even
bands like the Rolling Stones and KISS went with the disco craze. In this
case, it sounds like Metallica was trying to uses bits of the nu-metal
sound, primarily down tuned guitars. The lyrical content and vocals
are nowhere near as good as previous work from this band.
4) Production
a. The drum
problem falls into this area too. Was Bob Rock, who is best known for his
lavish production, trying to prove he could make a raw record? That might
be the case, but the end result of the overall production here is a poorly
executed job. If this album had been produced better, I would have an extremely
more positive take on it.
I’ve already used up
more space that I should have, but I wanted to state my case on why I came
to my conclusions about this album. I will leave off with this thought.
Way back when I was a wee nard, I saw Metallica for the second time at
the Monsters of Rock Festival at the LA Coliseum. When Metallica hit the
stage it was unbelievable, fans from up in the stands rushed down and knocked
over the fence that separated the floor level from us folks in the nosebleed
section and it was pure pandemonium. I thought of that when listening to
this disc and asked myself, “Would Metallica get the same response with
these songs?” and sadly I had to conclude they wouldn’t.
This isn’t a really
bad album but when measured against’ the group’s previous work, it just
doesn’t measure up.
Dr Fever's Review - He gave it a Rating
of
It is well documented
that I have supported Metallica through all their ups and down over the
last few years. So, that aside, I can honestly say; I like this album.
BUT I recognize it's faults. The production is a little weird and the snare
drum does sound like Lars is beating a plastic trashcan. Outside of that,
I dig the hell out of this album.
This album IS a sort
of return to the Metallica of old, but what you've got to keep in mind
is these guys are pushing 40 and have families n such, so completely re-hasing
their previous material would be, well, lame. They have evolved,
and this of course is just a horrible f*****g crime for so many Metallica
"FANS."
I will go on record
now by saying these two things:
1) If you
ever said "Hell yes I love Metallica, i'm a HUGE FAN!" and then you turn
around and bash the hell out of the album ONLY because it has no solos....YOU
were NEVER a Metallica fan.
2) If I hear the
no solos argument ONE MORE TIME I’m going to start slicing throats.
The Hobo's Review - He gave it a Rating
of
Rumors flew thick and fast leading up to
the release of St. Anger. Even before the album was released, it seemed
everyone had an opinion. The single, (also named St. Anger) didn’t have
the effect the band had hoped for, and acted as a very negative foreshadowing
of what was to come. The awkward time changes took a while to get used
to, as did the bands new sound. For those uninformed that ‘new sound’ consists
of Hammit’s and Hetfield’s guitars strung to low-B, a more prominent drums
kit complete with an infinitely irritating piccolo snare, and a new bassist
who seems to think he’s some kind of devil-ape thing.
My first take on the album was not a good
one. I thought I had wasted my money, and foolishly assumed the album was
going to be worthwhile. However, within twenty-four hours, I had adapted,
and now, enjoy it thoroughly. I do however have my criticisms.
The band is now extremely self-conscious,
and as such is preoccupied with attempting to hark back to the days of
Master of Puppets – at which they similarly fail. Lars tries to hard to
use faster beats and shoves double bass lines into everything no matter
how unsuitable or overused.
The notion that “there were no suitable
points for solos” (Hammit) is absolute nonsense. Throughout the album there
were points where solos were CRYING OUT to Hammit. Hetfield also managed
to lessen perfectly good songs like Frantic with stupid lyrics like “Frantic
tick tick tick tick tick tock”. And the band doesn’t seem to understand
it can’t maintain nine-minute song structures without any kind of solo.
Nit picking aside, however the album is
fairly enjoyable if you’re able to tune out all the politics and hype surrounding
the band. My favourite song on the album is Sweet Amber, which is only
missing an epic solo to make it a classic. It seems however that many people
jumping on the anti-Metallica bandwagon will rip at the new album for every
single flaw until it is severed from the musical world. The band, the fans,
and the haters have all become so self-aware that it is literally impossible
to listen to the album without analyzing every track to the point where
no one can hold a neutral opinion. Yes I loved Kill Em’ All to Justice,
but I also liked Garage Inc., because I was able to put aside the politics
and media frenzy, and listen to a damn good rock album.
Scott Slapp's Review - He gave it a Rating
of
I was asked to keep this quick, so I will.
All I can say after listening to this CD a dozen or so times (people told
me it grew on them), is now I understand why Metallica had bands like Linkin
Park and Limp Bizkit on their “icons” special. When they announced the
lineup I wondered what in the hell were they thinking but now I understand,
Metallica wants to be Limp Bizkit. Listening to the simplistic dropped-b
guitars and the vocal phrasing James used it became apparent that Metallica
are no longer content to be trend-setters (something they haven’t been
for years) but instead rest on the laurels of copping the popular sound
of the moment.
They hyped this thing up as the heaviest
record they have ever down, but I just don’t hear that at all. It doesn’t
have any of the fire and energy of early Metallica but is instead a “safe”
record designed to appeal to kids who buy up Limp Bizkit and Slipknot CD’s.
I’m no fan of Bob Rock, a guy that tends
to really over-produce every band he works with, but what in the hell happened
here? He went to the other extreme, this CD sounds like it was recorded
on an 8 track in a garage. I understand trying to get a rawer, more street
vibe sound, but this is just awful.
James forgot how to sing with real balls
years ago, once Bob Rock got a hold of him but he brings things to a new
low here and the lyrics are just plain lame at points. The worst part of
this whole ordeal is the drums. What in the hell happened here? Did Lars
throw his drumset away and just bang on the pots and pans from his kitchen?
Flame me all you want, but “St Anger” is
a new low from this once great band. I know the hardcore fans would praise
this band if they farted on tape but this CD is an embarrassment to the
Metallica name and I’m sure Cliff Burton and Satan are in a highly pissed
off mood down below when listening to this “product”.
Listen
to samples and Purchase this CD online
Visit
the official site for Metallica for more information on this CD and the
band
What
do you think of this CD? Click here to post your own review and read
other fan reviews!
|