musicNEWS:
Senators Sneak In Legislation that Threatens Live Music Events. It is now
the law!
05-17-03
antiGUY
.
It appears that Delaware Senator Joseph Biden
took the opportunity to sneak a controversial legislative rider onto the
Amber Alert Bill that both houses of Congress passed earlier this month
and the President signed into the law.
Biden along with co-sponsors, Senators
Grassley (R – Iowa), Lieberman (D -CT), Feinstein (D – Ca), attached
The Illicit Drug Anti-Proliferation Act to the Amber Alert Bill, legislation
designed to help authorities track down abducted children.
Biden had attempted to get The Illicit
Drug Anti-Proliferation Act signed into law previously under it’s original
title The Rave Act but his Congressional colleagues shot it down.
Opponents to this legislation claim that this bill “threatens your free
speech, right to dance and peacefully assemble and that threatens innocent
business owners”. And that it may effect more than Raves, that club and
live music venue holders should be freighted because it’s provisions reportedly
apply “crake house” laws to live music and dance events and if drugs or
drug paraphernalia is found to be on the premises of such an event then
the owners of the venue, management and even employees could be in hot
water.
Below is how the Drug Policy Alliance,
an advocacy group, interprets this new law in a posting to their website:
(followed by a link where you can read the actual law).
This year Senator Biden (D-DE) railroaded
controversial legislation through Congress that threatens your free speech,
right to dance and peacefully assemble and that threatens innocent business
owners. On April 10, 2003, both houses of Congress passed The Illicit
Drug Anti-Proliferation Act (formerly known as the “RAVE Act”), which
was attached to the AMBER Alert bill. The “RAVE Act” legislation was introduced
in a conference committee as an attachment to Senate bill 151, widely
referred to as the AMBER Alert bill, legislation about child abduction
that has nothing to do with drug policy issues. The “RAVE” Act, in contrast,
has not passed a single committee this year. In addition, it was
so controversial when it was introduced last year that two Senators
withdrew their sponsorship. The “RAVE” Act makes it easier for the federal
government to prosecute innocent business owners for the drug offenses
of their customers – even if they take steps to stop such activity!
Sadly, a Senate and House Conference Committee
agreed to attach the "RAVE Act" to the Amber Alert conference report despite
the fact that the "RAVE" Act did not have a public hearing, debate or a
vote this year. It is important to note due to overwhelming opposition
to the "RAVE Act" legislators were forced to remove some of the most egregious
language before it passed. For example, the word “rave” was removed from
the version of the bill that passed. Eliminating such blatant discrimination
is a victory for our continued freedom of speech. Also, the original bill
suggested that prosecutors should view the sale of water and the presence
of glowsticks or massage oil as evidence of drug use. These ludicrous "findings"
were completely removed thanks to activists who sent nearly 30,000 faxes
this year alone to their Senators urging them not to support such dangerous
legislation. This legislation has been signed by President Bush and is
now law.
When it was first introduced there was
widespread belief that this legislation would move through the Congress
quickly with no hope of revision. Instead, due to the overwhelming opposition
to this legislation it took 10 months, a change of power in the Senate,
backroom policymaking, and substantial changes to the bill before it was
passed – and even then it did not pass through “normal” legislative procedures.
The "RAVE" Act threatens free speech and
musical expression while placing at risk any hotel/motel owner, concert
promoter, event organizer, nightclub owner or arena/stadium owner for the
drug violations of 3rd parties – real or alleged – even if the event promoter
and/or property owner made a good-faith effort to keep their event drug-free.
It applies not just to electronic-music parties, but any type of public
gathering, including theatrical productions, rock concerts, DJ nights at
local bars, and potentially even political rallies. Moreover, it gives
heightened powers and discretion to prosecutors, who may use it to target
events they personally don’t like – such as Hip-Hop events and gay and
lesbian fundraisers.
The "RAVE" Act was first introduced last
year in the Senate by Senator Joe Biden (D-DE). A House version was introduced
by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX). Thanks to the support of thousands of voters
like you, Drug Policy Alliance and a coalition of friends and activists
around the country was able to stop both bills last year. Rep. Howard Coble
(R-NC) sponsored a new “RAVE” Act in the House and Senator Biden introduced
a Senate version entitled the Illicit Drugs Anti-Proliferation Act.
Opposition to the "RAVE" Act continues
to grow. The Drug Policy Alliance and its coalition of partners will continue
to work to protect property owners and prevent the further criminalization
of dance and music events, mobilize opposition and advocate fixing this
dangerous law.
Get
more information on DPA's efforts and find out how you can help by clicking
here.
You
can read the text of the bill by clicking here.
*correction - we originally erroneously reported that
Senator Grassley was a Democrat, he is a Republican.
tell
a friend about this article
know
of a news item we should cover?
antiMUSIC
News featured on RockNews.info and ARTISTdirect
NewsWire
.
|